<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/main.xsl"?>
<b:blog xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:b="http://blog.othree.net"  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://blog.othree.net http://blog.othree.net/blooog.xsd">
	<b:blogTitle>O3noBLOG</b:blogTitle>
	<b:blogDescription></b:blogDescription>
	<b:entries>
		<b:entriesMeta>
			<b:listType>s</b:listType>
			<b:listData listID="000412" baseName="09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0">09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0</b:listData>

			<b:previous>
				<b:mTitle>天將降大任於斯人也</b:mTitle>
				<b:mDate>2007/04/29</b:mDate>
				<b:mBase>the-one</b:mBase>
			</b:previous>


			<b:next>
				<b:mTitle>AACS決定對部落客宣戰</b:mTitle>
				<b:mDate>2007/05/05</b:mDate>
				<b:mBase>aacs-strikes-back</b:mBase>
			</b:next>

		</b:entriesMeta>
		<b:entry entryID="000412" baseName="09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0">
			<b:author>
				<b:authorName>othree</b:authorName>
				<b:authorEmail>othree@gmail.com</b:authorEmail>
				<b:authorUrl></b:authorUrl>
			</b:author>
			<b:datetime>
				<b:date>2007-05-03</b:date>
				<b:time>21:56:35</b:time>
			</b:datetime>
			<b:category>web</b:category>

			<b:CommentsAccepted>0</b:CommentsAccepted>


			<b:PingsAccepted>1</b:PingsAccepted>


			<b:title>09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0</b:title>
			<b:content>
				<b:summary>今天夠多人寫這件事了，不過我還是來寫一下。 有人破解出HD DVD的process key並且把他po到doom9的論壇，然後最近有人在blogger上發表這件事，然後有人digg他，結果digg.com就收到AACS的律師信，digg.com把該筆資料砍掉，結果使用者群起反抗，開始到處digg相關文章，接著還有了T-shirt、網站、歌和各種改圖...etc，最後digg.com決定和使用者站在同一邊～～。 這堆文章當中有幾段話我還蠻有感覺的： Digg創辦人Kevin Rose的Blog上面寫的很清楚（http://blog.digg.com/?p=74 ） But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you've made it clear. You'd rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear...</b:summary>
				<b:mainContent><p>今天夠多人寫這件事了，不過我還是來寫一下。</p>

<p>有人破解出HD <span class="caps">DVD</span>的process key並且把他po到<a href="http://www.doom9.org/">doom9</a>的論壇，然後最近有人在blogger上發表這件事，然後有人digg他，結果<a href="http://www.digg.com">digg.com</a>就收到<a href="http://www.aacsla.com/home"><span class="caps">AACS</span></a>的<a href="http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=3218">律師信</a>，digg.com把該筆資料砍掉，結果使用者群起反抗，開始到處digg相關文章，接著還有了<a href="http://www.cafepress.com/umbers.129066329">T-shirt</a>、<a href="http://09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0.org/">網站</a>、<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9HaNbsIfp0">歌</a>和各種改圖...etc，最後digg.com<a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=74">決定和使用者站在同一邊</a>～～。</p>

<p>這堆文章當中有幾段話我還蠻有感覺的：</p>

<blockquote><p>Digg創辦人Kevin Rose的Blog上面寫的很清楚（http://blog.digg.com/?p=74 ）<br />
But now, after seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you've made it clear. You'd rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won't delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be.<br />
If we lose, then what the hell, at least we died trying.<br />
（但現在，在看過了數以百計的故事和成千上萬的意見之後，各位已經清楚的表達了你們的意見。諸位寧見Digg因與跨國企業頑抗而亡，也不願見Digg因卑躬屈膝而活。我們聽見了，從這一刻開始我們將不會刪除任何與該密碼相關的文章和論述。我們也願意面對所有因此行為而造成的後果。<br />
就算我們最後依舊失敗，但至少我們曾努力奮戰到最後一刻。）</p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p>《紐約時報》的結論中引述了維吉尼亞大學法學院助理教授的話，因為有太多的網友參與這個事件，娛樂和內容產業自此將再也沒辦法進行任何有意義的法律行動，因為沒有人可以控告幾萬、甚至幾十萬人......</p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p>The company that tried to suppress mentions of "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" now achieved the exact opposite.</p></blockquote>


<ul>
<li><a href="http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/05/02/1818/"> 網絡暴民 Jacky's Blog - 洗版</a> ，我最早是看到jacky的文章</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.myoops.org/lucifer.php/2007/05/03/web_2_0c_a_a_s_1">朱學恆的路西法地獄 - Web 2.0的反撲.....</a> ，這篇始末都有，不過前面有蠻長的部份是在講無名。</li>
<li><a href="http://worker.bluecircus.net/archives/2007/05/web20digghd_dvd.html">工頭堅部落‧ 部落格臥客: (可能是)Web2.0時代的歷史大事：Digg之HD <span class="caps">DVD</span>破解碼事件</a> ，工頭堅也整理了一些blog entry</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.xdite.net/?p=337">digg 大暴動</a> ，連xdite都有記一篇</li>
<li><a href="http://www.kennyp.cn/2007/05/02/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0-let-me-understand-the-power-of-web-2-0-of-users/">09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 让我见识了 Web 2.0 用户的力量</a> ，這篇有詳細的始末報導</li>
<li><a href="http://taiwan.cnet.com/news/ce/0,2000062982,20117567,00.htm">Digg挺社群 不刪HD <span class="caps">DVD</span>破解資訊</a>  ，cnet的報導</li>
<li><a href="http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=121866">Processing Key, Media Key and Volume ID found!!!</a> ，doom9的該討論串</li>
<li><a href="http://linuxnotes.blogspot.com/2007/02/09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63.html">Linux Notes: post altered because of dmca:</a> ，被digg的那篇文章，文章內容已經被作者修改了</li>
<li><a href="http://www.seocritique.com/marketing/buzz-marketing/the-revolution-will-be-dugg">The Revolution Will Be Dugg</a> ，Digg使用者群起反抗時的抓圖</li>
</ul>

</b:mainContent>
				<b:extendContent></b:extendContent>
			</b:content>
			<b:comments commentCount="1">

				<b:comment commentID="016986" entryID="000412">
					<b:author>
						<b:authorName>bugryder</b:authorName>
						<b:authorEmail></b:authorEmail>
						<b:authorUrl></b:authorUrl>
					</b:author>
					<b:datetime>
						<b:date>2007-05-04</b:date>
						<b:time>14:24:23</b:time>
					</b:datetime>
					<b:content>
						<b:mainContent><p>同樣都是web2.0比某有名大站有風骨多了</p></b:mainContent>
					</b:content>
				</b:comment>

			</b:comments>
			<b:trackbacks trackbackCount="0" trackbackURL="http://othree.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/411">

			</b:trackbacks>
		</b:entry>
	</b:entries>
</b:blog>